
Mapping Out Your MVP Features: Clarity Over Complexity
š ļø āWhat if we just focus on the one feature users canāt live without?ā
Thatās what I asked Omar when we sat down to scope his MVP.
He had a laundry list of brilliant ideasāmost of them valuableābut trying to build them all in version one wouldāve been a fast track to burnout and budget blowout. š„
Shifting from āeverything we could buildā to āthe one thing we must proveā was a turning point.
This post walks you through the same process we used with Omar to prioritize, simplify, and stay laser-focused.
š« Why Feature Overload Happens (And How It Kills Momentum)
Many experienced foundersāespecially those in their 40sāsee the big picture clearly.
Thatās a strength... until it turns your MVP into a version-3 product. š
Hereās what too many MVPs include:
-
Too many āwhat ifā features
-
Edge cases that havenāt happened yet
-
Bells and whistles to impress investors
Reminder: An MVP isnāt meant to do everythingāitās meant to validate something.
ā The Goal: One Clear, Testable Hypothesis
Before you write a single feature requirement, answer this:
āWhatās the one thing our early users must be able to do that proves this product is valuable?ā
For Omar, it was simple:
āTrack vital signs in under 30 seconds using a modular health device.ā
Thatās it. Thatās what mattered. Everything elseādashboards, Bluetooth syncing, integrationsācould wait.
š§ Use These Frameworks to Prioritize Features
We used a mix of quick decision frameworks to help Omar focus. You can too:
š¹ MoSCoW Method
-
Must-Have: Core to MVP hypothesis
-
Should-Have: Useful but not essential
-
Could-Have: Nice to explore later
-
Wonāt-Have (for now): Clearly out of scope
š¹ Kano Model
-
Basic Needs: Users expect it
-
Performance Features: More = better
-
Delighters: Unexpected wow features
Using both, Omar narrowed down to 3 must-haves and tabled the rest for future iterations.
š§Ŗ Build the āMinimum Testable Versionā
The best MVPs:
-
Have clear user flows
-
Focus on a single job-to-be-done
-
Are functionalānot flashy
Instead of designing a sleek app and custom enclosure, Omar launched with:
-
A 3D-printed case
-
Off-the-shelf sensors
-
A simple mobile dashboard with one graph
That was enough to validate interestāand start getting feedback.
š Final Takeaway
šÆ Less is more when youāre testing for value.
The earlier you can strip your feature set to its core, the faster youāll get real feedbackāand avoid spending months building things no one asked for.
Like Omar, you may have 10 great ideas. Just donāt try to build all 10 in v1. Focus on the one users canāt live without.
š Want help scoping your MVP without wasting time or money?
Ā š SCHEDULE YOUR FREE STRATEGY SESSION
š Share + Save This
#MVPDevelopment #ProductStrategy #StartupFounders #BuildSmart #MinimumViableProduct #FounderIn40s #LeanStartup #HardwareStartup #SoftwareMVP
Leave a comment
This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.